This test doesn't seem to match its assertion. The class 'flip' doesn't seem to be adding anything.
Tom Clancy, 2008/07/24 08:19
Removed the 'flip' class. This was originally one test, split into 3 on Elika's advice:
“Test 002 is really two tests, one for 'auto' and one for '180deg'; I'd split it into two files. I'd also throw in a test for 450deg.”
Keep or remove?
Melinda Grant, 2008/08/28 15:13
Hmmm, I don't follow Elika's comments, relative to an assertion that the initial value is 0deg.
I think you need to do one image with no 'image-orientation' property (like you have for -a), then add the same image where 'image-orientation' has been set to '0', and declare that they are the same. Then throw in another image with a different 'image-orientation' to show that a different value produces a different effect.
I would modify -a and lose -b and -c. I assume there's another test that tests 90deg, 180deg, 270deg, and a modulo. If not, we should add one.
You could leave a comment if you were logged in.
test/css2.1/submit/88.txt · Last modified: 2014/12/09 15:48 (external edit)
Discussion
This test doesn't seem to match its assertion. The class 'flip' doesn't seem to be adding anything.
Removed the 'flip' class. This was originally one test, split into 3 on Elika's advice:
“Test 002 is really two tests, one for 'auto' and one for '180deg'; I'd split it into two files. I'd also throw in a test for 450deg.”
Keep or remove?
Hmmm, I don't follow Elika's comments, relative to an assertion that the initial value is 0deg.
I think you need to do one image with no 'image-orientation' property (like you have for -a), then add the same image where 'image-orientation' has been set to '0', and declare that they are the same. Then throw in another image with a different 'image-orientation' to show that a different value produces a different effect.
I would modify -a and lose -b and -c. I assume there's another test that tests 90deg, 180deg, 270deg, and a modulo. If not, we should add one.