initial values of flex
Background
There's been a lot of discussion lately (after the Hamburg F2F) on what the initial values of 'flex' should be, and there are some concerns raised by Ojan with the resolution recorded there.
Problem Statement
What are the best initial values for flex?
Proposal(s)
Proposal A: ''flex: none''
Pros
It's easier to use alignment and auto margins
Easier for use cases that want some but not most items flexible, e.g. one item takes up all free space
Cons
Doesn't have negative flexibility be default, which could help prevent overflow in many cases
Inconsistent with 'stretch' default in cross-dimension
Proposal B: ''flex: auto''
Pros
Negative flex is on by default, preventing overflow in many cases
Consistent with 'stretch' default in cross-dimension
Cons
Harder to use alignment and margins, since have to turn off flex first
More work for use cases that want most items inflexible
Proposal C: ''flex: 0 1 auto''
Pros
Negative flex is on by default, preventing overflow in many cases
Easy to use alignment and auto margins since positive free space is not flexed
Easy for use cases where free space is distributed to e.g. only one item
Cons
Resolution
The WG resolved on Proposal C.