This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Previous revision | |||
— | spec:css3-regions:archived-resolutions [2014/12/09 15:48] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ===== Resolutions ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This section keeps track of the CSS WG resolutions regarding the CSS Regions specification. A checkmark indicates that the resolution has been integrated at least in the latest editor draft. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Paris F2F February 2012 ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * ✔ Resolved: Bug 15159 for adding use cases to Regions spec is closed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== TPAC October 2011 ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * ✔ Resolved: regionLayoutUpdate is an asynchronous event (Issue 10) | ||
+ | * ✔ Resolved: close open issue on whether flow-from turns an element into a region, reopen if needed later (Issue 18) | ||
+ | * ✔ Resolved: If content computes to normal, then the element takes the flow. (Issue 22) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Seattle F2F July 2011 ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * ✔ RESOLVED: Copying Flow Content is not something we are looking at right now. | ||
+ | * ✔ RESOLVED: Change the grid to integrate with CSS regions content through regular elements | ||
+ | * ✔ RESOLVED: Stick to content property and content: from-flow(< | ||
+ | * ✔ RESOLVED: change flow to flow-smthing | ||
+ | * ✔ RESOLVED: rename content: from-flow to content: flow-from | ||
+ | * ✔ RESOLVED: for this version [initial version of CSS Regions] we are limiting regions to be block containers | ||
+ | * ✔ (no changes needed) RESOLVED: we need breaks that are specific to containers they are part of. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Kyoto F2F, June 2011, Saturday ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * ✔ RESOLVED: Switch content-order to take < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * ✔ use ident for flow names in CSS Regions | ||
+ | * < | ||
+ | * ✔ content selection should not be mentioned in the spec. It is a UI issue. | ||
+ | * ✔ confirmed that the event propagation model should not be modified. | ||
+ | * ✔ make the section on DOM events model informative. | ||
+ | * ✔ CSS OM View: | ||
+ | * ✔ confirmed the current proposal (NamedFlow + Element interface extension) | ||
+ | * ✔ agreed to add event on changes to regionOverflow and flowRanges |