Resolutions
This section keeps track of the CSS WG resolutions regarding the CSS Regions specification. A checkmark indicates that the resolution has been integrated at least in the latest editor draft.
Paris F2F February 2012
TPAC October 2011
TPAC October 2011, Sunday
✔ Resolved: regionLayoutUpdate is an asynchronous event (Issue 10)
✔ Resolved: close open issue on whether flow-from turns an element into a region, reopen if needed later (Issue 18)
✔ Resolved: If content computes to normal, then the element takes the flow. (Issue 22)
Seattle F2F July 2011
Seattle F2F July 2011, Monday
✔ RESOLVED: Copying Flow Content is not something we are looking at right now.
✔ RESOLVED: Change the grid to integrate with
CSS regions content through regular elements
✔ RESOLVED: Stick to content property and content: from-flow(<flow-name>)
✔ RESOLVED: change flow to flow-smthing
✔ RESOLVED: rename content: from-flow to content: flow-from
✔ RESOLVED: for this version [initial version of
CSS Regions] we are limiting regions to be block containers
✔ (no changes needed) RESOLVED: we need breaks that are specific to containers they are part of.
Kyoto F2F, June 2011, Saturday
Kyoto F2F June 2011, Saturday
✔ RESOLVED: Switch content-order to take <integer>
Discussed syntax for pushing to/pulling from named flows.
Briefly discussed integration of regions with multicol and grid layout.
Kyoto F2F June 2011, Saturday, Vincent's notes, WG Conference Call, [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2011-06-15
✔ use ident for flow names in
CSS Regions
Disagreement on whether CSS Regions should use the 'content' property or have separate 'flow-from' property that overloads 'content: normal'.
✔ content selection should not be mentioned in the
spec. It is a UI issue.
✔ confirmed that the event propagation model should not be modified.
✔ make the section on DOM events model informative.
-