This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| planning:tpac-2015 [2015/10/25 20:03] – [Agenda] astearns | planning:tpac-2015 [2015/10/26 21:15] (current) – astearns | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
| * wide gamut / deep color | * wide gamut / deep color | ||
| * Scroll Snap | * Scroll Snap | ||
| - | * May and August 2016 face-to-face meetings (or just one in June?) | + | |
| + | * Cascading | ||
| + | * Naming | ||
| + | * Positioning Syntax | ||
| + | * Other issues | ||
| + | | ||
| === Tuesday === | === Tuesday === | ||
| Line 83: | Line 88: | ||
| == PM == | == PM == | ||
| - | * Logical Syntax | ||
| - | * Cascading | ||
| - | * Naming | ||
| - | * Positioning Syntax | ||
| - | * Other issues | ||
| * take advantage of having all editors in the same room to have clearer status for all specs: where are we, ETA for next stage, how long did they remain at current stage, active editor or not, current work, etc. | * take advantage of having all editors in the same room to have clearer status for all specs: where are we, ETA for next stage, how long did they remain at current stage, active editor or not, current work, etc. | ||
| * even if the above does not work, refine priorities based on spec importance and current spec status; are there abandoned or semi-abandoned specs? | * even if the above does not work, refine priorities based on spec importance and current spec status; are there abandoned or semi-abandoned specs? | ||
| * some specs in the scope of the new Web Platform Working Group will require liaison with our WG. How can do better liaising with that new WG than with the former HTML WG? | * some specs in the scope of the new Web Platform Working Group will require liaison with our WG. How can do better liaising with that new WG than with the former HTML WG? | ||
| * Shadow DOM Styling - Tuesday 15:00-16:00 in WebApps room | * Shadow DOM Styling - Tuesday 15:00-16:00 in WebApps room | ||
| - | + | * following up yesterday’s wide gamut discussion, agenda+ what should we do with https:// | |
| - | + | * css-animations issues | |
| - | ==== Proposed Topics ==== | + | |