Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- planning:galicia-2020 [2020/01/23 14:40] – chris_harrelson
+++ planning:galicia-2020 [2020/01/24 05:55] (current) – astearns
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
   * **Also see [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=label%3A%22Agenda%2B+F2F%22|csswg-drafts issues]] and [[https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=label%3A%22Agenda%2B+F2F%22|fxtf-drafts issues]].**
   * Display Level 4: Display Noneness of Various Kinds **(LINK PLEASE???)**
-  * Inline 3: leading-trim etc. **(LINK PLEASE???)**
 ===== Schedule =====
@@ Line 76: / Line 75: @@
     * [[https://github.com/WICG/construct-stylesheets/issues/93|Should adoptedStyleSheets be ordered before other style sheets in the tree, instead of after?]]
     * [[https://github.com/WICG/construct-stylesheets/issues/45|Instead of assignable FrozenArray, use add / remove]]
+  * Color
+    * Serialization/OM issues
+      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/982|[css-color-4][cssom] Overlap between the definition of resolving color values and serializing <color> component values.]]
+      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/480|[css-color] Serializing color() values]]
+      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1004|[css-color][cssom] Serialization of specified <color> values]]
+      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1891|[css-color-4] Computed/used value of color doesn't specify how to serialize.]]
+      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/585|[cssom][css-color] Need clarification on serialization of `rgb` & `rgba` in light of css-color-4's syntax changes]]
   * Fonts
@@ Line 93: / Line 101: @@
 **Friday Morning**
   * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4497|[css-fonts] limit local fonts to those selected by users in browser settings]] Pete Snyder may call in
-  * Text
+  * Text part 1
-    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2818|[css-text-decor-4] Consider adding a third value (skip?) for text-decoration-skip-ink.]]
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4276|[css-text-decor] Clarifying skip-ink:auto behavior in relation to CJK text ]]
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4492|[css-ruby-1] ruby overhang control]]
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4419|[css-text] Line breaking for ambiguous characters; e.g., U+2010, U+2013]]
+  * Inline 3: [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Acss-inline-3+label%3A%22Agenda%2B+F2F%22|leading-trim etc.]]
+      * higher priority
+          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3978|make text of leading-trim interoperable?]]
+          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3955|apply leading-trim to inlines?]]
+          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4171|initial-letter feedback from implementation]]
+  * Text part 2
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4576|[css-text] Atomic inlines being equivalent to ID for line breaking is not web-compatible]]
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4445|[css-text] Writing System prose is currently unimplementable on ICU]]
+**Friday Afternoon**
+  * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4608|[css-color-adjust] Used color-scheme should affect the root element color, not initial color ]]
+  * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2513|idea to resolve the mod() conflict]] (tab)
+  * Text part 3
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4419| [css-text] Line breaking for ambiguous characters; e.g., U+2010, U+2013]]
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4405|[css-text] treat all-neutral lines same as empty ones for plaintext alignment]]
@@ Line 105: / Line 124: @@
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3481|[css-text] Remove collapsible line breaks adjacent to word separators]]
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/337|[css-text] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/337]]
+  * Inline 3: [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Acss-inline-3+label%3A%22Agenda%2B+F2F%22|leading-trim etc.]]
+      * lower priority
+          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4495|vertical-align: middle in vertical text]]
+          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4010|leading-trim overflow: ink or scrollable?]]
+          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3956|leading-trim vs descendant inlines]]
+          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3749|resolved value of line-height - follow-up]]
+          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3698|initial-letter zero sink?]]
-**Friday Afternoon**
+  * 5PM [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4531|[css-sizing] intrinsic-size lost the thread]]
+  * Fonts for afternoon callers part 2?
-  * Color
+    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4108|[css-fonts-4] font-display: optional without relayout]] (tabatkins, chrishtr)
-    * Serialization/OM issues
-      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/982|[css-color-4][cssom] Overlap between the definition of resolving color values and serializing <color> component values.]]
-      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1004|[css-color][cssom] Serialization of specified <color> values]]
-      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/480|[css-color] Serializing color() values]]
-      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1891|[css-color-4] Computed/used value of color doesn't specify how to serialize.]]
-      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/585|[cssom][css-color] Need clarification on serialization of `rgb` & `rgba` in light of css-color-4's syntax changes]]
-  * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4608|[css-color-adjust] Used color-scheme should affect the root element color, not initial color ]]
-  * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4531|[css-sizing] intrinsic-size lost the thread]]
 ==== Constraints ====