Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
planning:galicia-2020 [2020/01/23 17:53] – [Agenda] fantasaiplanning:galicia-2020 [2020/01/24 05:05] astearns
Line 15: Line 15:
   * **Also see [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=label%3A%22Agenda%2B+F2F%22|csswg-drafts issues]] and [[https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=label%3A%22Agenda%2B+F2F%22|fxtf-drafts issues]].**   * **Also see [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=label%3A%22Agenda%2B+F2F%22|csswg-drafts issues]] and [[https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=label%3A%22Agenda%2B+F2F%22|fxtf-drafts issues]].**
   * Display Level 4: Display Noneness of Various Kinds **(LINK PLEASE???)**   * Display Level 4: Display Noneness of Various Kinds **(LINK PLEASE???)**
-  * Inline 3: [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Acss-inline-3+label%3A%22Agenda%2B+F2F%22|leading-trim etc.]] +
-      * higher priority +
-          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3978|make text of leading-trim interoperable?]] +
-          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3955|apply leading-trim to inlines?]] +
-          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4171|initial-letter feedback from implementation]] +
-      * lower priority +
-          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4495|vertical-align: middle in vertical text]] +
-          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4010|leading-trim overflow: ink or scrollable?]] +
-          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3956|leading-trim vs descendant inlines]] +
-          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3749|resolved value of line-height - follow-up]] +
-          * +
 ===== Schedule ===== ===== Schedule =====
  
Line 85: Line 75:
     * [[https://github.com/WICG/construct-stylesheets/issues/93|Should adoptedStyleSheets be ordered before other style sheets in the tree, instead of after?]]     * [[https://github.com/WICG/construct-stylesheets/issues/93|Should adoptedStyleSheets be ordered before other style sheets in the tree, instead of after?]]
     * [[https://github.com/WICG/construct-stylesheets/issues/45|Instead of assignable FrozenArray, use add / remove]]     * [[https://github.com/WICG/construct-stylesheets/issues/45|Instead of assignable FrozenArray, use add / remove]]
 +
 +    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/982|[css-color-4][cssom] Overlap between the definition of resolving color values and serializing <color> component values.]]
 +    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/480|[css-color] Serializing color() values]]
  
   * Fonts   * Fonts
Line 102: Line 95:
 **Friday Morning** **Friday Morning**
   * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4497|[css-fonts] limit local fonts to those selected by users in browser settings]] Pete Snyder may call in   * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4497|[css-fonts] limit local fonts to those selected by users in browser settings]] Pete Snyder may call in
-  * Text +  * Text part 1
-    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2818|[css-text-decor-4] Consider adding a third value (skip?) for text-decoration-skip-ink.]]+
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4276|[css-text-decor] Clarifying skip-ink:auto behavior in relation to CJK text ]]     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4276|[css-text-decor] Clarifying skip-ink:auto behavior in relation to CJK text ]]
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4492|[css-ruby-1] ruby overhang control]]     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4492|[css-ruby-1] ruby overhang control]]
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4419|[css-text] Line breaking for ambiguous characters; e.g., U+2010, U+2013]]     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4419|[css-text] Line breaking for ambiguous characters; e.g., U+2010, U+2013]]
 +  * Inline 3: [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Acss-inline-3+label%3A%22Agenda%2B+F2F%22|leading-trim etc.]]
 +      * higher priority
 +          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3978|make text of leading-trim interoperable?]]
 +          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3955|apply leading-trim to inlines?]]
 +          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4171|initial-letter feedback from implementation]]
 +  * Text part 2
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4576|[css-text] Atomic inlines being equivalent to ID for line breaking is not web-compatible]]     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4576|[css-text] Atomic inlines being equivalent to ID for line breaking is not web-compatible]]
     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4445|[css-text] Writing System prose is currently unimplementable on ICU]]     * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4445|[css-text] Writing System prose is currently unimplementable on ICU]]
-    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4419| [css-text] Line breaking for ambiguous characters; e.g., U+2010, U+2013]] 
-    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4405|[css-text] treat all-neutral lines same as empty ones for plaintext alignment]] 
-    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4297|[css-text] Hanging spaces can't be scrollable overflow]] 
-    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3481|[css-text] Remove collapsible line breaks adjacent to word separators]] 
-    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/337|[css-text] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/337]] 
  
 **Friday Afternoon** **Friday Afternoon**
Line 119: Line 112:
   * Color   * Color
     * Serialization/OM issues     * Serialization/OM issues
-      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/982|[css-color-4][cssom] Overlap between the definition of resolving color values and serializing <color> component values.]] 
       * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1004|[css-color][cssom] Serialization of specified <color> values]]       * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1004|[css-color][cssom] Serialization of specified <color> values]]
-      * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/480|[css-color] Serializing color() values]] 
       * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1891|[css-color-4] Computed/used value of color doesn't specify how to serialize.]]       * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1891|[css-color-4] Computed/used value of color doesn't specify how to serialize.]]
       * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/585|[cssom][css-color] Need clarification on serialization of `rgb` & `rgba` in light of css-color-4's syntax changes]]       * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/585|[cssom][css-color] Need clarification on serialization of `rgb` & `rgba` in light of css-color-4's syntax changes]]
   * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4608|[css-color-adjust] Used color-scheme should affect the root element color, not initial color ]]   * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4608|[css-color-adjust] Used color-scheme should affect the root element color, not initial color ]]
-  * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4531|[css-sizing] intrinsic-size lost the thread]]+  * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2513|idea to resolve the mod() conflict]] (tab) 
 +  * Text part 3 
 +    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4419| [css-text] Line breaking for ambiguous characters; e.g., U+2010, U+2013]] 
 +    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4405|[css-text] treat all-neutral lines same as empty ones for plaintext alignment]] 
 +    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4297|[css-text] Hanging spaces can't be scrollable overflow]] 
 +    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3481|[css-text] Remove collapsible line breaks adjacent to word separators]] 
 +    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/337|[css-text] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/337]] 
 +  * Inline 3: [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Acss-inline-3+label%3A%22Agenda%2B+F2F%22|leading-trim etc.]] 
 +      * lower priority 
 +          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4495|vertical-align: middle in vertical text]] 
 +          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4010|leading-trim overflow: ink or scrollable?]] 
 +          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3956|leading-trim vs descendant inlines]] 
 +          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3749|resolved value of line-height - follow-up]] 
 +          * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3698|initial-letter zero sink?]] 
 + 
 +  * 5PM [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4531|[css-sizing] intrinsic-size lost the thread]] 
 +  * Fonts for afternoon callers part 2? 
 +    * [[https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4108|[css-fonts-4] font-display: optional without relayout]] (tabatkins, chrishtr)
  
 ==== Constraints ==== ==== Constraints ====
 
planning/galicia-2020.txt · Last modified: 2020/01/24 05:55 by astearns
Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki