This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
topics:alignment-names [2012/05/22 23:47] – fantasai | topics:alignment-names [2012/05/23 10:42] – Resolved the issue tabatkins | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Spec_tags | Spec_tags | ||
Owner_tags | Owner_tags | ||
- | Status_tags | + | Status_tags |
Added_dt | Added_dt | ||
Action | Action | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Agenda_urls | Agenda_urls | ||
---- | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === RESOLVED === | ||
+ | |||
+ | The WG resolved to go with Option D based on a straw poll in a telcon: justify-self/ | ||
=== Background === | === Background === | ||
Line 59: | Line 63: | ||
B | justify-inside | B | justify-inside | ||
C | justify-items | C | justify-items | ||
+ | |||
+ | Added after initial discussions... | ||
Set 4: Self/ | Set 4: Self/ | ||
Line 70: | Line 76: | ||
+--------X----------------Y------ | +--------X----------------Y------ | ||
- | A | inline-align-self | + | A | align-self-inline |
- | B | inline-align-content | + | B | align-content-inline |
- | C | inline-align-items | + | C | align-items-inline |
=== Summary of Comments === | === Summary of Comments === | ||
Line 176: | Line 182: | ||
[[http:// | [[http:// | ||
- | I think I'm leaning towards | + | I think I'm leaning towards |
reasonably well with the flexbox model: | reasonably well with the flexbox model: | ||
| | ||
Line 185: | Line 191: | ||
Set on flex item: | Set on flex item: | ||
align-self | align-self | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | If you want to keep consistency with other CSS properties (border, | ||
+ | background-position, | ||
+ | property name and there should be a shorthand to modify both axises. | ||
=== Conclusions === | === Conclusions === |