Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- topics:alignment-names [2012/05/22 23:47] – fantasai
+++ topics:alignment-names [2012/05/23 09:09] – fantasai
@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
   B | justify-inside   align-inside
   C | justify-items    align-items
+Added after initial discussions...
 Set 4: Self/Content/Items Inversion
@@ Line 70: / Line 72: @@
     +--------X----------------Y------
-  A | inline-align-self     stack-align-self
+  A | align-self-inline     align-self-stack
-  B | inline-align-content  stack-align-content
+  B | align-content-inline  align-content-stack
-  C | inline-align-items    stack-align-items
+  C | align-items-inline    align-items-stack
 === Summary of Comments ===
@@ Line 176: / Line 178: @@
 [[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0835.html|fantasai]]:
-  I think I'm leaning towards this myself, since it seems to fit
+  I think I'm leaning towards [Set 4] myself, since it seems to fit
   reasonably well with the flexbox model:
@@ Line 185: / Line 187: @@
   Set on flex item:
     align-self      - to set individual cross-position of item
+[[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0843.html|Remy]]:
+  If you want to keep consistency with other CSS properties (border,
+  background-position, ...) the axis should be at the end of the
+  property name and there should be a shorthand to modify both axises.
 === Conclusions ===