Home Specs Ideas Testing About
You are here: CSS Working Group Wiki » Testing » Reviewing Tests

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
test:css2.1:review [2012/06/16 11:16] – fantasaitest:css2.1:review [2012/06/16 11:26] – [Review Checklist] fantasai
Line 32: Line 32:
   * That the test is testing what it thinks it's testing. (I've run across many tests that think they're testing something, but are actually testing something else.)   * That the test is testing what it thinks it's testing. (I've run across many tests that think they're testing something, but are actually testing something else.)
   * That self-describing test instructions are accurate, precise, simple, and self-explanatory. Your mother/husband/roommate/brother/bus driver should be able to say whether the test passed or failed within a few seconds, and not need to spend several minutes thinking or asking questions.   * That self-describing test instructions are accurate, precise, simple, and self-explanatory. Your mother/husband/roommate/brother/bus driver should be able to say whether the test passed or failed within a few seconds, and not need to spend several minutes thinking or asking questions.
-  * That the reference for a reftest is accurate and will render identically to the test. +  * That the reference for a reftest is accurate and will render pixel-perfect identically to the test on all platforms. 
-  * That the reference for a reftest creates the reference rendering using a different technique that won't fail in the same way as the test.+  * That the reference for a reftest uses a different technique that won't fail in the same way as the test.
   * That the title is both //unique// and //descriptive// but not too wordy.   * That the title is both //unique// and //descriptive// but not too wordy.
   * That the test is as cross-platform as reasonably possible, working across different devices, screen resolutions, paper sizes, etc. If there are limitations (e.g. the test will only work on 96dpi devices, or screens wider than 200 pixels) that these are documented in the instructions.   * That the test is as cross-platform as reasonably possible, working across different devices, screen resolutions, paper sizes, etc. If there are limitations (e.g. the test will only work on 96dpi devices, or screens wider than 200 pixels) that these are documented in the instructions.
 
test/review.txt · Last modified: 2014/12/09 15:48 by 127.0.0.1
Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki