| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision |
| spec:reviews:html5 [2011/08/03 15:28] – [Official CSSWG Comments (DRAFT)] fantasai | spec:reviews:html5 [2011/08/03 15:34] – [Normative references to CSS editors' drafts] fantasai |
|---|
| We've added '':past'' and '':future'' to the Selectors 4 draft for you, btw. Next time please ask us if you need a selector defined. We might not get to it right away, but at least we will be aware that we need to draft a spec for it. | We've added '':past'' and '':future'' to the Selectors 4 draft for you, btw. Next time please ask us if you need a selector defined. We might not get to it right away, but at least we will be aware that we need to draft a spec for it. |
| |
| ==== ::cue and coordination ==== | ==== WebVTT rendering, ::cue, and coordination ==== |
| |
| ... | <sylvaing> did we log daniel's comment on 10.4.2: "This section is |
| | intended to be moved to its own CSS module once an |
| | editor is found to run with it." |
| | plinss: ::cue pseudo-element, :past/:future pseudo-classes |
| | plinss: We do have the general issue of HTML going off and defining |
| | pseudo-classes and pseudo-elements without talking to us about it. |
| | We need a general statement that they shouldn't do that. |
| | fantasai: Don't have a draft for ::cue, not intending to add it as we're |
| | defining pseudo-elements in their own related modules |
| | plinss: I think we can file it as a general issue that this isn't defined |
| | in CSS, there's been no communication to the CSSWG about it, it |
| | needs to be defined somewhere in CSS but we need to work together |
| | on it at some point in the future. |
| | ACTION plinss: Write up selectors coordination issue wrt ::cue et al. |
| |
| ==== Normative references to CSS editors' drafts ==== | ==== Normative references to CSS editors' drafts ==== |
| |
| ... | fantasai: CSSWG handles editors' drafts differently from HTMLWG, ours are |
| | not the official WG-endorsed copy |
| | <anne> no not the CSSWG |
| | <anne> some people in the CSSWG |
| | <anne> and some treat them pretty much the same |
| | hober: Should we maybe expedite some updates to WD? |
| | plinss: Yeah. We're happy to publish updates as soon as the editor says |
| | they have something to update |
| | hober: I think that would be useful to communicate in the comments |
| | plinss: I'll write that one up |
| | plinss: Should I provide a list? |
| | fantasai: could do, list them and the URLs they should be updated to |
| | ACTION plinss: Write comment on referencing CSSWG editors' drafts |
| |
| ==== Automatic height for transcluded elements (SEAMLESS attribute) ==== | ==== Automatic height for transcluded elements (SEAMLESS attribute) ==== |
