| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision |
| spec:reviews:html5 [2011/08/03 15:21] – [Chapter 10 more clearly marked as informative] fantasai | spec:reviews:html5 [2011/08/03 15:34] – [Normative references to CSS editors' drafts] fantasai |
|---|
| ===== Official CSSWG Comments (DRAFT) ===== | ===== Official CSSWG Comments (DRAFT) ===== |
| |
| * UI selectors - need to define / verify proper split of definition of UI selectors in CSS3-UI and how elements enter those states in HTML5 | ==== Pseudo-selectors ==== |
| * :ltr :rtl - should be :dir per Selectors 4; filed http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13346 | |
| * ::cue, ::cue(selector) | It is our understanding that the CSSWG defines pseudo-class selectors in its modules, and the HTMLWG defines how elements enter the corresponding states in HTML5. Given that understanding, this section seems to be missing normative references to the appropriate specs, i.e. Selectors 3 / CSS3 UI / Selectors 4. |
| * :past, :future - do we need a new CSS module for these? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jul/0413.html | |
| * normative references to CSS editors drafts. e.g. | With regards to '':ltr'' and '':rtl'', these should be updated to '':dir()'' per Selectors 4: see http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13346 |
| * ... to be provided | |
| * case-insensitive attribute value matching; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jul/0415.html | We've added '':past'' and '':future'' to the Selectors 4 draft for you, btw. Next time please ask us if you need a selector defined. We might not get to it right away, but at least we will be aware that we need to draft a spec for it. |
| * rendering depends on video { object-fit: contain; } | |
| * for defining <font> could be useful if CSS has font-size:xxx-large for a font size 50% larger than xx-large | ==== WebVTT rendering, ::cue, and coordination ==== |
| | |
| | <sylvaing> did we log daniel's comment on 10.4.2: "This section is |
| | intended to be moved to its own CSS module once an |
| | editor is found to run with it." |
| | plinss: ::cue pseudo-element, :past/:future pseudo-classes |
| | plinss: We do have the general issue of HTML going off and defining |
| | pseudo-classes and pseudo-elements without talking to us about it. |
| | We need a general statement that they shouldn't do that. |
| | fantasai: Don't have a draft for ::cue, not intending to add it as we're |
| | defining pseudo-elements in their own related modules |
| | plinss: I think we can file it as a general issue that this isn't defined |
| | in CSS, there's been no communication to the CSSWG about it, it |
| | needs to be defined somewhere in CSS but we need to work together |
| | on it at some point in the future. |
| | ACTION plinss: Write up selectors coordination issue wrt ::cue et al. |
| | |
| | ==== Normative references to CSS editors' drafts ==== |
| | |
| | fantasai: CSSWG handles editors' drafts differently from HTMLWG, ours are |
| | not the official WG-endorsed copy |
| | <anne> no not the CSSWG |
| | <anne> some people in the CSSWG |
| | <anne> and some treat them pretty much the same |
| | hober: Should we maybe expedite some updates to WD? |
| | plinss: Yeah. We're happy to publish updates as soon as the editor says |
| | they have something to update |
| | hober: I think that would be useful to communicate in the comments |
| | plinss: I'll write that one up |
| | plinss: Should I provide a list? |
| | fantasai: could do, list them and the URLs they should be updated to |
| | ACTION plinss: Write comment on referencing CSSWG editors' drafts |
| |
| ==== Automatic height for transcluded elements (SEAMLESS attribute) ==== | ==== Automatic height for transcluded elements (SEAMLESS attribute) ==== |
