Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision |
| spec:process [2012/02/07 06:58] – Tantek | spec:process [2012/02/07 13:52] – [Spec Advancement Process] fantasai |
|---|
| ====== Spec Advancement Process ====== | ====== Spec Advancement Process Proposal ====== |
| By default the CSSWG follows the W3C Process: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/ | By default the CSSWG follows the W3C Process: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/ |
| |
| Here are some thoughts on improvements. | Here are some thoughts on improvements. |
| |
| ===== test and implementation driven accelerated spec advancement ===== | ===== test and implementation driven agile spec advancement ===== |
| One of the most common criticisms of the CSSWG is that specs/features take too long. In particular many features have been implemented with vendor prefixes, inconveniencing authors and implementers alike for *years* and resulting in a need to maintain support for prefixed properties ([[https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/Layout/CSS_Compatibility#CSS_vendor-prefix_compatibility|or worse]]). | One of the most common criticisms of the CSSWG is that specs/features take too long. In particular many features have been implemented with vendor prefixes, inconveniencing authors and implementers alike for *years* and resulting in a need to maintain support for prefixed properties ([[https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/Layout/CSS_Compatibility#CSS_vendor-prefix_compatibility|or worse]]). |
| |
