This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
spec:issue-tracking [2011/11/10 16:50] – fantasai | spec:issue-tracking [2018/04/25 09:39] – [Responding to Last Call Comments] chrisl | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Issue Tracking ====== | + | ====== Issue Tracking |
- | Issues | + | ===== Where to Track Issues |
- | * Editor' | + | Issues are tracked in the CSS Working Group by the spec editors using one of the following |
- | * If all issues | + | |
- | * Each CSS spec tracks issue in one of the four following | + | |
- | - [[: | + | |
- | - [[http:// | + | |
- | - [[http:// | + | |
- | - Inline in the spec itself | + | |
- | If you're editing a spec, please use one of the four mechanisms above. | + | * [[: |
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | * Inline in the spec itself | ||
+ | |||
+ | Each spec has a link in its header to where issues are tracked for the draft (e.g. see " | ||
If you have a better mechanism you'd like to use, please first propose it to the working group. | If you have a better mechanism you'd like to use, please first propose it to the working group. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Editor' | ||
+ | |||
+ | It is part of an editor' | ||
+ | |||
+ | (The CSSWG editor role is that of an intelligent secretary: you can freely draft things in the early stages, call the shots on the straightforward and obvious changes when you know the boss would agree and won't need to review personally---but you're not in charge here.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | The level of WG oversight on a spec [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Responding to Last Call Comments ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | (This is actually good practice for all issues, not just Last Call. But it's especially important for Last Call.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | First, file the issue. Then, in your response include: | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Link to the filed issue. | ||
+ | - Your response: | ||
+ | | ||
+ | * If you are accepting, exactly what edits were made. (If you haven' | ||
+ | * If you are rejecting, the rationale for rejecting. | ||
+ | - Request confirmation that the proposed resolution is OK. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Good examples (better examples would link to the issue): | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Bad examples: | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | In some cases, the issue is more complicated and some back and forth is required. But at some point, there should be a final response that represents the editors' | ||
+ | |||
+ | There is a [[https:// | ||