This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
ideas:spec-styling [2011/11/29 14:51] – [Martin Duerst] vhardy | ideas:spec-styling [2011/11/30 06:59] – [Robin Berjon] vhardy | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==== Requirements & Feedback ==== | ==== Requirements & Feedback ==== | ||
- | ===== Martin | + | ===== Loretta Guarino Reid ===== |
+ | |||
+ | Speaking of all the contrast issues, can we please ensure that the new style meets WCAG 2.0 AA? I haven' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Martin | ||
1) As many others have said, don't force me to read with a fixed width. | 1) As many others have said, don't force me to read with a fixed width. | ||
Line 72: | Line 77: | ||
* It would be good to test the style for <dfn> in text body and not just in property definition tables. A lot of specs also have specific styles for links to definitions. | * It would be good to test the style for <dfn> in text body and not just in property definition tables. A lot of specs also have specific styles for links to definitions. | ||
- | * A lot of specs now use highlighting, | + | * A lot of specs now use highlighting, |
===== Dave Raggett on contrast ===== | ===== Dave Raggett on contrast ===== |