This is an old revision of the document!
It seems to me that this and image-fit-005 are essentially testing the same thing. The assertion for 005 encompasses a superset of this assertion.
I'd merge the two tests: include both assertions, use the title from 005, use the source from 006.
Ok, I've combined the two into this test. Think it's ok to add a status of “Deleted” to handle cases like 005?
For 005, I think 'Rejected:Duplicate' would be appropriate (per the flow diagram).
This one looks good.
Discussion
It seems to me that this and image-fit-005 are essentially testing the same thing. The assertion for 005 encompasses a superset of this assertion.
I'd merge the two tests: include both assertions, use the title from 005, use the source from 006.
Ok, I've combined the two into this test. Think it's ok to add a status of “Deleted” to handle cases like 005?
For 005, I think 'Rejected:Duplicate' would be appropriate (per the flow diagram).
This one looks good.