Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
test:css2.1:review-checklist [2012/08/29 16:48]
rhauck [Metadata]
test:css2.1:review-checklist [2014/12/09 15:48] (current)
Line 49: Line 49:
   * [ ] The test is as cross-platform as reasonably possible, working across different devices, screen resolutions,​ paper sizes, etc. If there are limitations (e.g. the test will only work on 96dpi devices, or screens wider than 200 pixels), these are documented in the instructions.   * [ ] The test is as cross-platform as reasonably possible, working across different devices, screen resolutions,​ paper sizes, etc. If there are limitations (e.g. the test will only work on 96dpi devices, or screens wider than 200 pixels), these are documented in the instructions.
   * [ ] The spec backs up the expected behavior in the test. (I've run into a number of tests that make assumptions I could'​ve sworn were in the spec, but aren't there when I go and check. Since this often means the spec forgot to handle something, you should send a message to www-style about it.)   * [ ] The spec backs up the expected behavior in the test. (I've run into a number of tests that make assumptions I could'​ve sworn were in the spec, but aren't there when I go and check. Since this often means the spec forgot to handle something, you should send a message to www-style about it.)
-  * [ ] The test makes no assumptions that aren't in the [[http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/​Test/​CSS2.1/current/|list of common assumptions]]+  * [ ] The test makes no assumptions that aren't in the [[http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/latest/#common|list of common assumptions]]
  
 ===== Nitpicky ===== ===== Nitpicky =====
 
test/css2.1/review-checklist.txt · Last modified: 2014/12/09 15:48 (external edit)
Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki