Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
test:css2.1:review-checklist [2012/08/29 16:48] – [Metadata] rhaucktest:css2.1:review-checklist [2013/01/09 13:40] – [Test Design] Link to list of common assumptions gtalbot
Line 49: Line 49:
   * [ ] The test is as cross-platform as reasonably possible, working across different devices, screen resolutions, paper sizes, etc. If there are limitations (e.g. the test will only work on 96dpi devices, or screens wider than 200 pixels), these are documented in the instructions.   * [ ] The test is as cross-platform as reasonably possible, working across different devices, screen resolutions, paper sizes, etc. If there are limitations (e.g. the test will only work on 96dpi devices, or screens wider than 200 pixels), these are documented in the instructions.
   * [ ] The spec backs up the expected behavior in the test. (I've run into a number of tests that make assumptions I could've sworn were in the spec, but aren't there when I go and check. Since this often means the spec forgot to handle something, you should send a message to www-style about it.)   * [ ] The spec backs up the expected behavior in the test. (I've run into a number of tests that make assumptions I could've sworn were in the spec, but aren't there when I go and check. Since this often means the spec forgot to handle something, you should send a message to www-style about it.)
-  * [ ] The test makes no assumptions that aren't in the [[http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/|list of common assumptions]]+  * [ ] The test makes no assumptions that aren't in the [[http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/latest/#common|list of common assumptions]]
  
 ===== Nitpicky ===== ===== Nitpicky =====
 
test/css2.1/review-checklist.txt · Last modified: 2014/12/09 15:48 by 127.0.0.1
Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki