Home Specs Ideas Testing About
You are here: CSS Working Group Wiki » Testing » CSS 2.1 Test Suite » CSS Test Review Checklist

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
test:css2.1:review-checklist [2012/06/16 11:26] – [Test Design] fantasaitest:css2.1:review-checklist [2013/01/09 13:40] – [Test Design] Link to list of common assumptions gtalbot
Line 22: Line 22:
 Getting these correct lets us automatically index and manipulate the tests. Getting these correct lets us automatically index and manipulate the tests.
  
-  * [ ] Title is //unique// and //descriptive// but not wordy. (It should make sense in the test suite's [[http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/html4/by-section.htm|table of contents]].)+  * [ ] Title is //unique// and //descriptive// but not wordy. (It should make sense in the test suite's [[http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html|table of contents]].)
   * [ ] Title starts with ''CSS Test: ''.   * [ ] Title starts with ''CSS Test: ''.
   * [ ] One or more <link> elements [[test:format#credits|credit the author(s)]].   * [ ] One or more <link> elements [[test:format#credits|credit the author(s)]].
Line 28: Line 28:
   * [ ] Any necessary [[test:format#requirement-flags|requirement flags]] are given.   * [ ] Any necessary [[test:format#requirement-flags|requirement flags]] are given.
   * [ ] The [[test:format#test-assertions|test assertion]] is a **complete**, **detailed** statement expressing **specifically** what the test is attempting to prove (and is therefore not a duplicate of any other assertion in the test suite).   * [ ] The [[test:format#test-assertions|test assertion]] is a **complete**, **detailed** statement expressing **specifically** what the test is attempting to prove (and is therefore not a duplicate of any other assertion in the test suite).
- 
 ===== Test Contents ===== ===== Test Contents =====
  
Line 50: Line 49:
   * [ ] The test is as cross-platform as reasonably possible, working across different devices, screen resolutions, paper sizes, etc. If there are limitations (e.g. the test will only work on 96dpi devices, or screens wider than 200 pixels), these are documented in the instructions.   * [ ] The test is as cross-platform as reasonably possible, working across different devices, screen resolutions, paper sizes, etc. If there are limitations (e.g. the test will only work on 96dpi devices, or screens wider than 200 pixels), these are documented in the instructions.
   * [ ] The spec backs up the expected behavior in the test. (I've run into a number of tests that make assumptions I could've sworn were in the spec, but aren't there when I go and check. Since this often means the spec forgot to handle something, you should send a message to www-style about it.)   * [ ] The spec backs up the expected behavior in the test. (I've run into a number of tests that make assumptions I could've sworn were in the spec, but aren't there when I go and check. Since this often means the spec forgot to handle something, you should send a message to www-style about it.)
-  * [ ] The test makes no assumptions that aren't in the [[http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/|list of common assumptions]]+  * [ ] The test makes no assumptions that aren't in the [[http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/latest/#common|list of common assumptions]]
  
 ===== Nitpicky ===== ===== Nitpicky =====
 
test/css2.1/review-checklist.txt · Last modified: 2014/12/09 15:48 by 127.0.0.1
Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki