Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
ideas:spec-styling [2011/11/29 19:52] – [Martin Durst] vhardyideas:spec-styling [2014/12/09 15:48] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 ==== Requirements & Feedback ==== ==== Requirements & Feedback ====
 +
 +===== Christoph Päper =====
 +
 +http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/site-comments/2011Dec/0026.html
  
 ===== Loretta Guarino Reid ===== ===== Loretta Guarino Reid =====
Line 77: Line 81:
   * It would be good to test the style for <dfn> in text body and not just in property definition tables. A lot of specs also have specific styles for links to definitions.   * It would be good to test the style for <dfn> in text body and not just in property definition tables. A lot of specs also have specific styles for links to definitions.
  
-  * A lot of specs now use highlighting, links, etc. for WebIDL snippets. That would be good to have some agreement on as well. Yes, I know that it's a lot of style :)+  * A lot of specs now use highlighting, links, etc. for WebIDL snippets. That would be good to have some agreement on as well. Yes, I know that it's a lot of style :) This is just an example, and it does not necessarily carry consensus, but for IDL segments themselves you can look at any API spec that uses ReSpec (which is a large number of them). An example is http://www.w3.org/TR/contacts-api/. It does not necessarily exercise all the styles — I could probably construct a document that does.
  
 ===== Dave Raggett on contrast =====  ===== Dave Raggett on contrast ===== 
 
ideas/spec-styling.1322625122.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/12/09 15:48 (external edit)
Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki