Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
ideas:spec-styling [2011/11/29 19:52] – [Martin Durst] vhardyideas:spec-styling [2012/01/05 18:57] vhardy
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 ==== Requirements & Feedback ==== ==== Requirements & Feedback ====
 +
 +===== Christoph Päper =====
 +
 +http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/site-comments/2011Dec/0026.html
  
 ===== Loretta Guarino Reid ===== ===== Loretta Guarino Reid =====
Line 77: Line 81:
   * It would be good to test the style for <dfn> in text body and not just in property definition tables. A lot of specs also have specific styles for links to definitions.   * It would be good to test the style for <dfn> in text body and not just in property definition tables. A lot of specs also have specific styles for links to definitions.
  
-  * A lot of specs now use highlighting, links, etc. for WebIDL snippets. That would be good to have some agreement on as well. Yes, I know that it's a lot of style :)+  * A lot of specs now use highlighting, links, etc. for WebIDL snippets. That would be good to have some agreement on as well. Yes, I know that it's a lot of style :) This is just an example, and it does not necessarily carry consensus, but for IDL segments themselves you can look at any API spec that uses ReSpec (which is a large number of them). An example is http://www.w3.org/TR/contacts-api/. It does not necessarily exercise all the styles — I could probably construct a document that does.
  
 ===== Dave Raggett on contrast =====  ===== Dave Raggett on contrast ===== 
 
ideas/spec-styling.txt · Last modified: 2014/12/09 15:48 by 127.0.0.1
Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki