This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
ideas:mistakes [2019/12/05 05:28] – CNS chrisl | ideas:mistakes [2020/03/10 18:47] – fantasai | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* '' | * '' | ||
* '' | * '' | ||
+ | * Not quite a mistake, because it was a reasonable default for the 90s, but it would be more helpful since then if `background-repeat` defaulted to `no-repeat`. | ||
* The 4-value shorthands like '' | * The 4-value shorthands like '' | ||
* '' | * '' | ||
Line 48: | Line 49: | ||
* The alignment properties in Flexbox should have been writing-mode relative, not flex-flow relative, and thus could have reasonably understandable names like align-inline-* and align-block-*. | * The alignment properties in Flexbox should have been writing-mode relative, not flex-flow relative, and thus could have reasonably understandable names like align-inline-* and align-block-*. | ||
* shape-outside should have had wrap- in the name somehow, as people assume the shape should also clip the content as in clip-path. | * shape-outside should have had wrap- in the name somehow, as people assume the shape should also clip the content as in clip-path. | ||
+ | * It shouldn' |