This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| faq [2018/03/15 15:33] – [Selectors that Depend on Layout] Explanation of why :hover isn't as bad. tabatkins | faq [2018/10/04 16:21] – [Adding more named colors] tabatkins | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 288: | Line 288: | ||
| TBD | TBD | ||
| + | ===== Adding more named colors ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Question === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Can we add new named colors to CSS? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | === Answer === | ||
| + | |||
| + | No. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == more details == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The built-in set of named colors in CSS is weird and bad, and we keep them mainly for legacy interop reasons. There' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Naming colors can be done in stylesheets using custom properties. It is not likely we will ever add more names to the built-in set. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === References === | ||
| + | |||
| + | https:// | ||